It’s not vile or poorly constructed, but it is a blatant attempt at merchandising crap to children and not in a good way. Who gives a fuck if Alfred has a family that thinks being a butler sucks?īatman & Robin is not a good film. It’s supposed to be about him and it’s supposed to be reflected by the character around him.
#Batman and robin movie
Making her Alfred’s niece and somehow making the movie about that is just… weird and counterproductive to everything that’s fun about Batman. Now, Batgirl is historically Commissioner Gordon’s daughter, which makes sense. It’s basically trying to sell you a new toy. If I understood correctly, the main idea of Batman & Robin was to introduce a new character: Batgirl, played by the aforementioned Alicia Silverstone. The most meaningful relationship explored in Batman & Robin is reserved to Bruce Wayne and Alfred, which is the weirdest fucking choice ever. On top of being devoid of Batman’s classic dramatic traits, it’s basically a two-hours confrontation between ice man, plant girl and Bat millionaire.
#Batman and robin full
Christopher Nolan’s trilogy is full of transgressions. Now, I don’t mind a movie not respecting Batman’s canon. Freeze’s relationship to his frozen wife is supposed to echo Batman’s relationship to his dead parents, but Batman & Robin is completely tone-deaf to that. This is also the reason why Batman & Robin is not good, for it doesn’t seem to understand that. The reason why Batman gained such a rabid comic book following is simple: he’s an archetype of accomplished human potential who’s fighting enemies who are dark reflections of his own personality. This is basically what’s going on, but there’s also a crazy botanist, Alicia Silverstone and a whole lot of unrequited Alfred ( Michael Gough). Now partners, the titular Batman ( George Clooney) and his young adult sidekick Robin ( Chris O’Donnell) are attempting to put a lid on a crime spree committed by a new, ice-themed villain named Mr. It’s a movie so bad, it tests the limit of post-mortem revisionist nostalgia.īatman & Robin is the direct sequel to Joel Schumacher’s Batman Forever, which is a weird soft reboot of Tim Burton’s Batman run. Batman & Robin will never be fondly remembered, though.
Films like Lost Boys and Falling Down will definitely be remember more fondly now that Schumacher kicked the bucket. Once an artistic legacy becomes complete, it can be contextualized and appreciated for what it is. This is always a good thing for creatives in popular culture. Sure, Joel.Film director Joel Schumacher passed away earlier this year. was angling for "a more serious direction" featuring a "psychologically complex take on the character" - something Schumacher claims to have wanted to do following Batman Forever before "getting pushback from the studio and ultimately making Batman & Robin" instead. although Silverstone's Batgirl would not have starred alongside them. (Pun very much intended.)Īccording to The Hollywood Reporter, Batman Unchained would have been directed by Schumacher himself as a follow-up to Batman & Robin, and would have still starred Clooney and O'Donnell as the titular heroes. One such attempt was the canceled sequel, Batman Unchained, and if recently-surfaced details are any indication, it would have been.wait for it. In fact, after the film hit theaters, the Batman film franchise nearly didn't recover: It would take eight years before Christopher Nolan made the much more serious and on-brand Batman Begins with Christian Bale, after many aborted attempts to restart the franchise along the way. Though the cast, which included George Clooney, Chris O'Donnell, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Uma Thurman, and Alicia Silverstone, was golden, the film ended up disappointing much of its fanbase when it was released.
If you ever watched Joel Schumacher's 1997 Batman franchise sequel, Batman & Robin, then you know the film (and its infamous bat nipples) was kind of.well, not exactly a masterpiece.
0 kommentar(er)
